Robotic Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgery in the Setting of a Comprehensive Robotic Cardiac Program: Early and Mid-term Outcomes in 500 Consecutive Patients
H. Kitahara1, S. Nisivaco2, R. Bhasin3, I. Hamzat1, K. Grady1, H. H. Balkhy4 1The university of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 2University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 3University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 4The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
The university of Chicago Chicago, Illinois, United States
Disclosure(s):
Hiroto Kitahara, MD: No financial relationships to disclose
Purpose: Robotic cardiac surgery is experiencing an increase in adoption with 15% of mitral valve (MV) repairs being performed robotically in the US. We initiated a comprehensive multi-spectrum robotic cardiac surgery program in 2013 with emphasis on the totally-endoscopic approach. We reviewed outcomes of patients undergoing MV surgery within this context. Methods: A retrospective review of 1570 robotic endoscopic cardiac surgical procedures performed at our institution between September 2013 and July 2023 was conducted. Of these, 502 consecutive patients underwent robotic totally-endoscopic MV operations and were analyzed. All mitral pathologies were included whether they required repair (via 8-mm port) or replacement (via 20-mm port). Early and mid-term outcomes of the MV patients were reviewed. Results: The median age was 65-years and 40% were male. Ninety-four percent of patients had mitral regurgitation (MR) and 6% had rheumatic stenosis. Of the MR patients, 62% had isolated posterior leaflet prolapse. Mean STS predicted mortality risk was 2% [range 0.15-19.4] and 44 patients had previous cardiac surgery. MV repair occurred in 98% of patients with degenerative MR. Concomitant procedures included: Cox-maze procedure in 109 patients (22%); tricuspid valve repair in 43 (9%); septal myectomy in 10, totally endoscopic coronary bypass in 5 and robotic aortic valve replacement in 2 patients. Endo-aortic balloon occlusion was used in 70%, fibrillatory arrest in 21% and external clamping in 9% of patients. Intra-operative echo revealed trace/no residual MR in 96% and mild residual MR in 4%. MV replacement occurred in 59 patients, of which 83% were non-degenerative (60% rheumatic, 40% other including endocarditis, functional, and failed previous MV procedure). Observed-to-expected thirty-day mortality was 0.5. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.8+1.4 days. Clinical follow-up was complete in 99% of patients at mean 39-months, and re-operation for recurrent MR was 2.4%. Follow-up echo at mean 42-months showed 8% of patients with degenerative MR had moderate or more recurrent MR. Conclusion: Robotic endoscopic MV surgery, including MV replacement as well as concomitant procedures, is feasible within the context of a comprehensive multi-spectrum robotic cardiac surgery program with good outcomes.
Identify the source of the funding for this research project: none